RESUMEN
Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a rare thyroid malignancy with a dire prognosis, nearly 100% disease specific mortality and a median overall survival less than 6 months. In view of the limited data from India on anaplastic thyroid cancer, we conducted this audit to analyze the treatment pattern, outcomes and factors influencing it. This is a retrospective analysis of outcomes of patients treated in a single institution between January 2008 and December 2020. Baseline characteristics, treatment received, and outcomes among adult patients with ATC were collected. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. SPSS version 20 and RStudio version 3.1.1 were used for analysis. In this cohort of 134 patients, the median age at diagnosis was 59 years, with 63.4% of them being females. At presentation, 70.9% of them had good performance status (PS 0-1). Only 38.8% received treatment with curative intent (either surgery fb adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy fb surgery and adjuvant or definitive chemoradiotherapy) while 61.2% patients received palliative treatment (either palliation alone or palliative chemotherapy or palliative surgery or palliative RT). Predominant pattern of progression was local progression (79.8%). Median PFS and OS of the overall cohort were 58 days and 80 days respectively. PFS and OS were significantly better in patients treated with curative intent vs palliative intent (116 and 134 days vs 45 and 50 days; p = 0.00 and 0.00 respectively). Among patients treated with curative intent, OS was significantly better in patients undergoing surgery vs CTRT (155 vs 76 days; p = 0.03). Among patients treated with upfront surgery, both PFS and OS were better with the addition of adjuvant CTRT/RT vs no adjuvant (332 and 540 days vs 55 and 91 days; p = 0.00 and 0.003 respectively). ATC is a rare cancer with dismal prognosis. Local therapy with surgery followed adjuvant seems to be associated with the better outcomes. Systemic therapy seems to be a better option for palliation. Our data reflects the real world data of this rare cancer.
RESUMEN
Resection of the inferior vena cava (IVC) for malignancy is a technically demanding procedure. We present a series of six cases of resection of the IVC for retroperitoneal sarcomas, four of which were primary caval tumors. We outline the technical difficulties faced in these complex procedures and discuss the oncological outcomes of these rare tumors. We performed a retrospective review of six patients operated for retroperitoneal masses involving the inferior vena cava between April 2015 and July 2016 at our tertiary care institute. Six patients underwent resection of the IVC, three of which required a multivisceral resection. An artificial prosthesis was used to reconstruct the IVC in three patients, whereas two patients underwent primary repair of the vein wall. One patient did not require any reconstruction. Margins were microscopically positive in two out of six patients. All patients received radiotherapy, either in the neo-adjuvant or adjuvant setting. Two patients developed local recurrences with a median follow-up of 24.5 months. Resection of the IVC for extirpation of retroperitoneal sarcomas is a technically complex and difficult procedure. The availability of a multidisciplinary team of surgeons and state-of-the-art intensive care support is essential for good outcomes.
